Data-driven is the ‘and’ to your fundriasing

(not the or)

Fundraisers are so used to working by feel. Without the tools and resources their for-profit sales and marketing counterparts enjoy. The issue is that this has been the way for so long that now, when sophisticated tools have become affordable and available to the nonprofit sector, they are ignored and even worse shunned.

Fundraisers know a lot about donors and what they are giving to their organizations, and have names for many different types of donors they are interested in. (prospect, first time, lapsed, LYBUNT, SYBUNT etc.) And fundraisers know that, on average, it costs 7x more to acquire a new donor than it does to keep an existing one. They have KPI’s for the number of donors, the amount of donations, and even the percentage of donations by donor type, but when it comes to actually tracking donors through the different stages and types, they are relying on feel because they lack the tools or resources to put that kind of effort into each and every individual donation.

Case in point. With all of the different types of donors mentioned, and knowing that it’s more effective to renew donors than find new ones, there is no standard name or type for donors that had lapsed but have now returned to giving to the organization. Even though these donors should represent a prime target of low hanging fruit as it were. The work involved in figuring out who these people are, segmenting them and targeting them with a campaign is seen as prohibitive. Any modern CRM and marketing automation system can not only identify these prospects but also include them into an ongoing campaign automatically.

The fundraisers who adapt quickly and take advantage of a modern marketing stack stand to benefit their organizations substantially, while the rest keep feeling around in the dark.

Similar Posts

  • Starting with the right Why

    I recently had the great fortune to be involved with the creation of a first of it’s kind Interpetive Centre. Speaking in very general terms, usually, when you start creating museum exhibits you dig through your collection and figure out what you want to show. You group artifacts together in some meaningful way and you…

  • Process v. Impact

    Let’s face it. Most nonprofits out there aren’t really about making an impact. Oh sure they have lots of great messaging about the amazing work they do, and a statement of change with a logic model and a great mission and vision. And of course they are filled with people who are all fired up…

  • Technology in Exhibits

    Recent advances in technology has opened up some incredible opportunities for organizations that rely on exhibits. Museums, Interpretive Centres, and Science Centres, can now take advantage of new technology in their exhibits and capitalize on potential that most don’t even know they are missing. Traditional exhibits have obviously been around for a long time and…

  • Nonprofits and scale

    I had a fascinating conversation at a conference the other day that revolved around why nonprofits don’t seem to be able to really move the the needle on some of the really tough issues we face today (see Dan Pallotta’s – the way we think about charity is dead wrong). Apart from the obvious argument…